From: Pete BEAULIEU ('62) Sandstorm Extra that might be political Re: Political ? Extra To: Frank WHITESIDE ('63) I really appreciate your "political" side comments, but also propose that words are not so elastic that they can mean anything to anybody. There must be something else at work here... Try this "political" suspicion: Is it possible that in some ways we from Richland are members of a sort of cult? Here we are, a bunch of folks with the same self-congratulatory STEM upbringing, all friends and all good natured, but in our dotage now allergic on this website to wandering outside the convenient sandbox of sensitivity. And some have longer antennas than others, but others really are downright insulting. More than the flexible meaning of words, there can be a certain opaquenss to this. I recall noticing this all-too-human frailty (which we all share) when after a tour in the Navy I was entering graduate studies at the University of Washington in the early '70s. Here I was buried under the book shelves, and suddenly noticed something profoundly instructive. The newly formed OPEC imposed a global oil shortage and price hike, much to the dismay of Marxist poli sci graduate students who simply knew in their hearts that only the West was capable of organized collusion against the masses. Prices went up in the West this time, and at ground level the gas lines got really long. But something else also happened...Here in my sweaty palms was a Far East journal article featuring riots in the streets of Calcutta because bus fares were being edged up a nickle or so, probably to cover fuel costs. Riots! But total silence on something else. Only a few miles away in the vast rural regions of India the oil issue was quite different, because the literally millions of subsistence farmers could no longer afford petroleum- based fertilizer for their crops. Large-scale hunger and even starvation in the eighty percent of India that is rural versus high visibility tweaks in bus fares in that twenty percent of India that is urban. Selective outrage is more than a linguistic quirk. Life is just to big to take it all in, and we often choose to be too small. I think all of us settle too quickly into one bubble or another, and that we too quickly lose our innate curiosity, and with it our interest and possibly deep communion in the mystery of one another. Superficial chatter, mimicking our talking head and clueless newscasters, is good enough to get through the day. Having put much of reality on hold, including the reality within, we become primitively sensitive like any other mindless amoeba in a carefully monitored environment. Cheers. But it may also be that the vast majority is actually loftier in their thoughts than you and me, Oh yes (!!!), and just want at least one virtual pub where we/they can simply share nastalgic memories of Spudnut donuts. (By the way, the current recipe falls short of the one I remember so well.) Fine, but it was sobering to see that even my careful and successful entry of March 18, 2011 (re mushroom clouds and such) is now off limits and sidelined, and even those nastalgic and happy memories of our universal grandfather figure, Daddy Dewald. -Pete BEAULIEU ('62) ****************************************************************